Aid Leveraging Strategies for MBA Programs: A Data-Driven Approach

The landscape of MBA education is shifting, requiring institutions to rethink their approach to financial aid and scholarship optimization. To capitalize on recent application growth after two years of stagnation and market shifts, MBA programs must balance financial sustainability with maintaining a competitive, high-quality student body. Scholarships can be a strategic tool for optimizing enrollment, revenue, and class composition, but their effectiveness varies significantly based on institutional ranking, program format, and competitive positioning. Some institutions treat their MBA programs as brand-strengthening loss leaders, while others rely on tuition revenue as a primary financial driver. Understanding these distinctions is key to developing effective, data-informed aid optimization strategies.

‍

Market Trends & Their Implications for Yield Strategy

Our team has decades of experience working in business schools and in scholarships and financial aid. We have noted recent shifts in MBA application patterns that underscore the urgency of adapting scholarship strategies. According to the 2024 GMAC Application Trends Survey, total applications to graduate business programs increased by 12% year-over-year after two years of decline. Full-time, in-person MBA programs experienced a 32% application surge – their highest growth in a decade. However, the growth was uneven:

‍

• Domestic applications grew by 19%, while international applications increased by only 1%. This shift may require reallocating aid budgets toward domestic applicants or refining international scholarship strategies.
• Online and hybrid MBAs continued to gain popularity, with 58% of online and 52% of hybrid programs reporting application growth. Schools competing in these spaces must consider scholarship models that cater to the needs of working professionals.
• Top-tier MBA yield rates have declined, with the top 10 programs seeing a 16% drop from 2016 to 2023 (Poets & Quants). This trend indicates that even prestigious programs must fine-tune their scholarship strategies to remain competitive against mid-tier schools that offer aggressive scholarships.

‍

On top of this past year’s trends, the previous GMAC Application Trends Survey (2023) reported that applicants are increasingly more experienced and likely older, with the share of full-time MBA applicants having 6+ years of work experience rising by 6 percentage points since 2019. There were more candidates with 10+ years of experience applying to professional and executive programs as well. We have noticed this shift toward older applicant pools in working with our clients as well. As the applicant pool skews older, schools may need to adjust aid strategies to accommodate mid-career professionals who prioritize flexible programs, tuition reimbursement options, employer sponsorships, and loan assistance programs.

‍

The shifts in applicant behavior over the past few years, coupled with client conversations suggesting 2025 may be even more challenging, require institutions to rethink their traditional aid strategies to stay competitive in a changing market.

‍

How Institutional Tiers Must Adjust Aid Strategies

Top-Tier MBA Programs (M7, Top 15 Schools) still leverage brand prestige and career outcomes, but declining yield rates mean they must refine financial aid strategies. With rising domestic applications and stagnant international growth, they must think critically about the balance of aid between these groups. Competition is increasing as mid-tier schools aggressively offer scholarships to top candidates, requiring data-driven aid optimization to sustain selectivity without excessive discounting. While demand for full-time MBAs remains strong, the rise of online and hybrid formats poses another competitive threat to attracting students seeking flexibility for those not already offering such programs. Yet, different modalities add a layer of complexity to aid optimization. Institutions must consider differential scholarship strategies across their program portfolio; candidates seeking flexibility to attend a top-ranked hybrid program may not expect or require the same scholarship offer as a student seeking a two-year full-time program at the same institution.

‍

Mid-Tier MBA Programs (Ranked 16-50) must balance selectivity and revenue, using a mix of merit- and targeted aid to attract strong applicants while maintaining financial health. With cost sensitivity rising, many schools leverage employer tuition support and industry-specific scholarships to increase affordability. The threat of hybrid and online MBA programs is more pronounced amongst this competitive set, especially as the average age of applicants skews older. As a result, schools must adjust aid strategies to capture working professionals seeking flexibility and consider offering these programs if they are not already doing so. While mid-tier programs benefit from a growing applicant pool, they encounter a dual threat: top-tier schools expanding scholarships and regional and online MBAs offering lower-cost options. Institutions operating in this challenging environment can provide targeted aid and highlight their unique strengths to potential candidates. For instance, institutions might offer scholarships to regionally based candidates interested in obtaining their MBA locally or focus aid on candidates hailing from industries where the institution has academic and career-placement strengths, such as finance.

‍

Regional MBA Programs must remain price-competitive, but excessive tuition discounting threatens sustainability. Instead, these schools can explore the recruitment of students that are supported by outside aid sources, like veterans and active-duty service members. Scholarships targeting in-state students or key local industries can help attract strong candidates while improving affordability. Differentiating through industry-focused aid – such as funding for students in fields with strong employer ties – enhances value. Further, as competition grows in the online and hybrid MBA space, these programs must adjust aid models to effectively reflect and communicate their points of differentiation relative to larger, well-branded alternatives.

‍

Key Takeaways & Final Considerations

• Financial aid is no longer just a recruitment tool – it is a competitive differentiator. Schools must use data-driven models to optimize awards for institutional goals around yield, revenue, and student employability and quality.
• The rise of online and hybrid MBA programs has permanently altered the competitive landscape, coinciding with an applicant pool that is older and more experienced. Institutions must adjust aid models not only to compete across modalities but also to address the financial needs of mid-career professionals, such as offering targeted scholarships, tuition reimbursement partnerships, and flexible payment plans.
• Schools can no longer compete on price alone. Instead, they should leverage targeted scholarships for high-value applicants, industry-driven partnerships, and deploy flexible aid strategies tailored to specific student needs.

‍

As the MBA market continues to evolve, schools that strategically adapt their aid optimization models will be best positioned to attract high-quality candidates, maintain financial sustainability, and optimize enrollment outcomes.